soliciting writing advice
Oct. 1st, 2008 11:35 amMy laptop died, and it's killed my ability to get any writing done. My old laptop also weighed close to 10 lbs, which greatly interfered with me taking it anywhere else to write with even when it was working.
So, I'm looking at buying a new laptop. I want something lighter, and I refuse to run Windows Vista. I'm looking at basically two models: the Lenovo IdeaPad S10, and the Lenovo 3000 N200.
The differences: the Ideapad is a "notebook", smaller than a full-size laptop, weighs around 3lbs. No CD/DVD drive. Keyboard is smaller than usual. The 3000 N200 is a full-size laptop, weighs 6 1/2 lbs, has the CD/DVD and all that comes with a regular laptop. Battery on Ideapad lasts two to three times as long. I could put linux on either if I wanted to, but both currently come with XP which is not especially objectionable. Price difference is about $120, which is for the purposes of this purchase fairly insignificant. Both are reasonable in terms of hard drive, cpu speed, i/o, etc.; since all I want to be able to do is run Word, I don't need massive power. The lighter weight of the notebook really appeals to me, but realistically even the 3000 N200 is significantly lighter than my old dead Dell. (Dell also makes a mini but it appears to be distinctly inferior.)
So, the question I don't have an answer to is, if I got the Ideapad, would I be more encouraged to take it places and write? Or would I regret not having all the other bells & whistles of the regular laptop? Anyone out there in FLland using a mini laptop for writing or other tasks and want to weigh in on how useful they've found it?
So, I'm looking at buying a new laptop. I want something lighter, and I refuse to run Windows Vista. I'm looking at basically two models: the Lenovo IdeaPad S10, and the Lenovo 3000 N200.
The differences: the Ideapad is a "notebook", smaller than a full-size laptop, weighs around 3lbs. No CD/DVD drive. Keyboard is smaller than usual. The 3000 N200 is a full-size laptop, weighs 6 1/2 lbs, has the CD/DVD and all that comes with a regular laptop. Battery on Ideapad lasts two to three times as long. I could put linux on either if I wanted to, but both currently come with XP which is not especially objectionable. Price difference is about $120, which is for the purposes of this purchase fairly insignificant. Both are reasonable in terms of hard drive, cpu speed, i/o, etc.; since all I want to be able to do is run Word, I don't need massive power. The lighter weight of the notebook really appeals to me, but realistically even the 3000 N200 is significantly lighter than my old dead Dell. (Dell also makes a mini but it appears to be distinctly inferior.)
So, the question I don't have an answer to is, if I got the Ideapad, would I be more encouraged to take it places and write? Or would I regret not having all the other bells & whistles of the regular laptop? Anyone out there in FLland using a mini laptop for writing or other tasks and want to weigh in on how useful they've found it?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:11 pm (UTC)I used to do a lot of writing on a PDA and folding keyboard, as well as a Toshiba Libretto. Of the two, I liked the PDA better for battery, convenience, and fast boot; in fall and winter the whole package fit into a jacket pocket. However, with the form factor you could never get enough screen real estate to really look at a piece and it made cut and paste precarious because you were scrolling all over to move chunks of text. These days I just lump it and carry the full-sized laptop.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:11 pm (UTC)George is light enough that I take it more places. And it's got a nice long battery life (with the monitor brightness down to a bit less than half, and bluetooth and webcam turned off.)
The one quibble I have with him is the right shift key is in a bad spot, I don't have as much trouble as I used to, but I still find myself hitting the enter key or one of the arrow keys by mistake.
I suspect that the lenovo won't have that problem.
And if you need an optical drive, you can always get a usb one.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 06:52 pm (UTC)Keyboard size really is my primary reservation at this point.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:36 pm (UTC)The only caveat is that the eeepc screen is not very high, and that it sometimes slows me down in editing. You might want to see how much height you need to be comfortable with.
But it is very easy to take along with you.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:57 pm (UTC)Downsides:
No OS X.
Keyboard--didn't have problems with my old netBook, but I've never fully gotten used to the Fujitsu keyboard. Sounds like the s10 is going to have a much better keyboard than usual for a little machine, though.
No OS X.
Screen real estate--workable, but you're not getting a full page of text up there.
Did I mention no OS X? I want Scrivener, damn it! Not so much an issue for you--but it's the one reason why I'd consider going to a full-sized laptop. And I'd miss the form factor the entire time.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 05:06 pm (UTC)I love the Vaio. I would recommend it in a heartbeat. It isn't the cheapest option out there but it's by far the best I've found.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 05:47 pm (UTC)My Tablet PC (from 2004) doesn't have a CD/DVD drive either. I haven't missed having one all. When I'm not at home, I never do anything that requires the CD/DVD drive. However, I do have a USB DVD drive that I keep at home. I plug it for those rare cases when I have to install software (or reinstall the operating system) from CD/DVD. That's about the only reason why I use the DVD drive with the laptop. (e.g., I don't watch movies or the like on my laptop.)
I use my laptop for a limited number of things: writing, web browsing, Chinese handwriting recognition, annotating PDFs (and playing bridge). It wasn't considered all that computationally powerful in 2004. It doesn't have a CD/DVD drive. And that's ok. (However, it's a full sized 12.1" laptop. So it has a full sized keyboard and a high density display. 1440x1050)
The difference between 3lbs and 6lbs is huge. (Yes, I realize you're coming from 10lbs.) If you find yourself carrying the laptop around a lot, you will likely notice the difference. If you don't need the extra computing power, you might as well spend your money on something that's lighter with longer battery life. (Again, test drive the keyboard first.)
Having said that, what I discovered about myself is that unless it fits in my pocket, I won't be encouraged to take it with me anywhere. I own a Newton. It's useless for web browsing, but it's a pleasure to write and edit with. (The handwriting recognition works surprisingly well.) It's about the size of a VHS cassette and weighs two pounds. Despite being so small and light, I still don't take it with me anywhere. My moleskine notebook, OTOH, fits in my pocket and it's always with me.
However, that's me. I know people who take their full sized laptops where ever they go. Certainly, I know people who swear by their mini-notebook.
If you're only ever going to use the laptop for writing, I don't think you'll miss the bells and whistles. Or at least I haven't yet. However, you may want to make sure that you either never have to install anything from disc, or have access to an external DVD drive when you need it. If the keyboard works for you, giving up some computational power which you weren't going to use anyway in favor of a lighter computer with longer battery life is really tempting. (Again, try out the keyboard.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 06:47 pm (UTC)